errorEN 16931

UBL-SR-44:An Invoice may only have one unique PaymentID, but the PaymentID may be used...

Your invoice has multiple different PaymentID values across PaymentMeans elements. EN16931 allows only one unique payment reference value, though it can be repeated across multiple payment means.

Severity
Fatal
Rule set
EN 16931
Country
All EU
Fix type
AUTO-FIX
Confidence
85%
Category
structural

Engine Classification

Harmonize all PaymentID values to match the first occurrence

Confidence: 85% · Applied automatically in pipeline

What is UBL-SR-44?

UBL-SR-44 is a fatal validation rule defined in the EN 16931 specification. It validates the PaymentID element in the UBL invoice XML.

When this rule fires, the invoice is non-compliant and will be rejected by Peppol access points and national validation services. The sending system receives a rejection response and the invoice does not reach the buyer.

Target path: //cac:PaymentMeans/cbc:PaymentID

Why This Error Matters

Invoice will be rejected. Receiving systems expect a single payment reference to reconcile the payment.

UBL-SR-44 is a hard failure. Invoices that trigger this rule are rejected at the access point and never reach the recipient. In Peppol networks, this means your sending system receives an MLR (Message Level Response) with a rejection status. The invoice must be corrected and re-sent, adding delay to your payment cycle.

Invoice Navigator can automatically correct this error in your pipeline. The fix is applied with full audit evidence, so your compliance trail remains intact.

Validator Behavior

  • ·Causes invoice rejection
  • ·Error returned: UBL-SR-44
  • ·Specification: EN 16931

Before / After

Failing XML
<Invoice>
  <!-- Issue: An Invoice may only have one unique PaymentID. -->
</Invoice>
Corrected XML
<Invoice>
  <!-- Issue resolved per EN 16931 -->
</Invoice>

Technical Reference

XPath//cac:PaymentMeans/cbc:PaymentID
SpecEN 16931
Operationset_value
StrategyHarmonize all PaymentID values to match the first occurrence

Common Causes

  • ·Different payment references assigned to different payment methods
  • ·ERP generates unique PaymentID per PaymentMeans entry
  • ·Multiple payment options each given their own reference
  • ·Data migration did not consolidate payment references
  • ·Manual editing introduced conflicting payment IDs

Seeing this in production? The API handles UBL-SR-44 automatically. See the fix response →

See Also

Last updated: 27 February 2026

Share this guide:

Handle UBL-SR-44 Automatically in Your Pipeline

The compliance engine auto-remediates this error with controlled safety policies and evidence pack generation.