errorUBL 2.1

UBL-CR-645:A UBL invoice should not include the InvoiceLine DeliveryTerms

UBL 2.1 Invoice schema does not include `cac:DeliveryTerms`. This element must be removed for EN 16931 compliance.

Severity
Fatal
Rule set
UBL 2.1
Country
All EU
Fix type
AUTO-FIX
Confidence
95%
Category
structural

Engine Classification

Remove disallowed UBL element per EN16931 specification

Confidence: 95% · Applied automatically in pipeline

What is UBL-CR-645?

UBL-CR-645 is a fatal validation rule defined in the UBL 2.1 specification. It validates the DeliveryTerms element under InvoiceLine in the UBL invoice XML.

When this rule fires, the invoice is non-compliant and will be rejected by Peppol access points and national validation services. The sending system receives a rejection response and the invoice does not reach the buyer.

Target path: /Invoice/cac:InvoiceLine/cac:DeliveryTerms

Why This Error Matters

Invoice will be rejected by EN16931 validators. These conformance rules prohibit UBL elements that are not part of the EN16931 e-invoicing profile. Remove the disallowed element.

UBL-CR-645 is a hard failure. Invoices that trigger this rule are rejected at the access point and never reach the recipient. In Peppol networks, this means your sending system receives an MLR (Message Level Response) with a rejection status. The invoice must be corrected and re-sent, adding delay to your payment cycle.

Invoice Navigator can automatically correct this error in your pipeline. The fix is applied with full audit evidence, so your compliance trail remains intact.

Validator Behavior

  • ·Causes invoice rejection
  • ·Fails UBL schema validation
  • ·Error returned: UBL-CR-645
  • ·Specification: UBL 2.1

Before / After

Failing XML
<Invoice>
  <cac:DeliveryTerms>value</cac:DeliveryTerms>
</Invoice>
Corrected XML
<Invoice>
  <!-- cac:DeliveryTerms removed for EN 16931 compliance -->
</Invoice>

Technical Reference

XPath/Invoice/cac:InvoiceLine/cac:DeliveryTerms
SpecUBL 2.1
Operationremove
StrategyRemove disallowed UBL element per EN16931 specification

Common Causes

  • ·Invoice line contains DeliveryTerms element
  • ·InvoiceLine DeliveryTerms not in EN16931 profile
  • ·Line-level delivery terms not permitted
  • ·Incoterms at line level not needed in e-invoice
  • ·ERP exports line-specific delivery conditions

Seeing this in production? The API handles UBL-CR-645 automatically. See the fix response →

See Also

Last updated: 27 February 2026

Share this guide:

Handle UBL-CR-645 Automatically in Your Pipeline

The compliance engine auto-remediates this error with controlled safety policies and evidence pack generation.