DK-R-007:For Danish suppliers PaymentMandate/ID and PayerFinancialAccount/ID are...
Fix: Danish suppliers using payment means 49 (direct debit) must provide both PaymentMandate/ID and PayerFinancialAccount/ID. These identify the mandate agreement and account to debit. Provide the required value in the free validator.
Danish suppliers using payment means 49 (direct debit) must provide both PaymentMandate/ID and PayerFinancialAccount/ID. These identify the mandate agreement and account to debit.
Engine Classification
Business data required · Explicit input workflow · No assumptions made
Required input: Payment Mandate ID, Payer Financial Account
What is DK-R-007?
DK-R-007 is a fatal validation rule defined in the OIOUBL (Denmark) specification (DNK national rules).
When this rule fires, the invoice is rejected by Peppol access points and never reaches the buyer.
Why This Error Matters
Invoice will be rejected by Danish validation. Direct debit requires complete mandate and account information.
DK-R-007 is a hard failure — the invoice must be corrected and re-sent before it can reach the recipient.
Validator Behavior
- ·Causes invoice rejection
- ·Fails UBL schema validation
- ·Error returned: DK-R-007
- ·Specification: OIOUBL (Denmark)
How to Fix It
Identify the missing data
Danish suppliers using payment means 49 (direct debit) must provide both PaymentMandate/ID and PayerFinancialAccount/ID. These identify the mandate agreement and account to debit.
Provide the required value
Danish suppliers using payment means 49 (direct debit) must provide both PaymentMandate/ID and PayerFinancialAccount/ID. These identify the mandate agreement and account to debit.
Re-validate your invoice
Upload the corrected invoice to confirm DK-R-007 is resolved.
Before / After
<Invoice> <!-- Issue: For Danish suppliers using payment means 49 (direct debit), --> </Invoice>
<Invoice> <!-- Issue resolved per OIOUBL (Denmark) --> </Invoice>
Technical Reference
Common Causes
- ·Mandate ID missing for direct debit
- ·Payer account ID not provided
- ·Direct debit selected without mandate information
- ·ERP does not capture mandate details
- ·Payment method changed to 49 without required fields
Seeing this in production? The API handles DK-R-007 automatically. See the fix response →
Frequently Asked Questions
Danish suppliers using payment means 49 (direct debit) must provide both PaymentMandate/ID and PayerFinancialAccount/ID. These identify the mandate agreement and account to debit.
Danish suppliers using payment means 49 (direct debit) must provide both PaymentMandate/ID and PayerFinancialAccount/ID. These identify the mandate agreement and account to debit. You can also use Invoice Navigator's compliance engine to correct this automatically in your pipeline.
Yes, DK-R-007 is a critical error that will cause invoice rejection. It must be fixed before submission.
Many instances of DK-R-007 can be automatically corrected using Invoice Navigator's compliance engine. The fix is applied in your pipeline with full audit evidence.
Related Errors
Related Content
Last updated: 14 April 2026
Validate your invoice
Drop your XML here to check for DK-R-007
Fix DK-R-007 with guided input
Upload your invoice and we'll ask for the missing data, then apply a safe, auditable fix.