BR-IC-11:Missing delivery date for intra-community supply. Invoices with VAT category...
Missing delivery date for intra-community supply. Invoices with VAT category "Intra-community supply" (K) must have either a delivery date (BT-72) or invoicing period (BG-14).
Engine Classification
1. Check VAT category consistency. 2. Ensure rates match categories. 3. Add missing identifiers.
Confidence: 85% · Applied automatically in pipeline
What is BR-IC-11?
BR-IC-11 is a fatal validation rule defined in the EN 16931 specification. It validates the ram:CountryID element under ram:PostalTradeAddress in the UBL invoice XML.
When this rule fires, the invoice is non-compliant and will be rejected by Peppol access points and national validation services. The sending system receives a rejection response and the invoice does not reach the buyer.
Target path: ram:ShipToTradeParty/ram:PostalTradeAddress/ram:CountryID
Why This Error Matters
Invoice will be rejected. Intra-community supply (category IC) requires both seller and buyer VAT numbers for reverse charge mechanism. Missing elements prevent cross-border VAT compliance verification.
BR-IC-11 is a hard failure. Invoices that trigger this rule are rejected at the access point and never reach the recipient. In Peppol networks, this means your sending system receives an MLR (Message Level Response) with a rejection status. The invoice must be corrected and re-sent, adding delay to your payment cycle.
Invoice Navigator can automatically correct this error in your pipeline. The fix is applied with full audit evidence, so your compliance trail remains intact.
Validator Behavior
- ·Causes invoice rejection
- ·Error returned: BR-IC-11
- ·Specification: EN 16931
Before / After
<cac:TaxTotal> <cac:TaxSubtotal>-100.00</cac:TaxSubtotal> </cac:TaxTotal>
<cac:TaxTotal> <cac:TaxSubtotal>100.00</cac:TaxSubtotal> </cac:TaxTotal>
Technical Reference
ram:ShipToTradeParty/ram:PostalTradeAddress/ram:CountryIDCommon Causes
- ·Intra-community category on document charge without breakdown
- ·Document-level charge with IC category needs matching breakdown
- ·Charge with IC category not reflected in tax subtotal section
- ·cac:AllowanceCharge (charge) IC missing from tax breakdown
- ·IC charge handling incomplete in invoice structure
Seeing this in production? The API handles BR-IC-11 automatically. See the fix response →
See Also
Related Errors
Last updated: 27 February 2026
Handle BR-IC-11 Automatically in Your Pipeline
The compliance engine auto-remediates this error with controlled safety policies and evidence pack generation.