errorbusinessEN 16931

BR-CO-22:Document charge reason required

Fix: Invoice Navigator automatically fixes this issue by correcting the `cac:AllowanceCharge` element in your Invoice (BR-CO-22). Upload your invoice to fix this automatically.

Each Document level charge (BG-21) shall contain a Document level charge reason (BT-104) or a Document level charge reason code (BT-105), or both.

Severity
Fatal
Rule set
EN 16931
Country
All EU
Fix type
AUTO-FIX
Confidence
85%
Category
structural

Engine Classification

Add default charge reason code AAA when both reason text and code are missing

Confidence: 85% · Applied automatically in pipeline

What is BR-CO-22?

BR-CO-22 is a fatal validation rule defined in the EN 16931 specification. It validates the AllowanceChargeReasonCode element in the UBL invoice XML.

When this rule fires, the invoice is rejected by Peppol access points and never reaches the buyer.

Target path: //cac:AllowanceCharge[cbc:ChargeIndicator='true' and not(cbc:AllowanceChargeReason) and not(cbc:AllowanceChargeReasonCode)]/cbc:AllowanceChargeReasonCode

Why This Error Matters

Invoice rejected. Buyers must know what charges they're paying for.

BR-CO-22 is a hard failure — the invoice must be corrected and re-sent before it can reach the recipient.

Invoice Navigator can automatically correct this error in your pipeline. The fix is applied with full audit evidence, so your compliance trail remains intact.

Validator Behavior

  • ·Causes invoice rejection
  • ·Error returned: BR-CO-22
  • ·Specification: EN 16931

How to Fix It

1.

Add reason code

Add AllowanceChargeReasonCode (BT-105) with a valid UNTDID 7161 code like AAA (Service charge) or FC (Freight)

2.

Or add reason text

Alternatively, add AllowanceChargeReason (BT-104) with descriptive text

3.

Verify placement

Ensure reason is within the same AllowanceCharge element where ChargeIndicator=true

Before / After

Failing XML
<Invoice>
  <cac:AllowanceCharge>INVALID_CODE</cac:AllowanceCharge>
</Invoice>
Corrected XML
<Invoice>
  <cac:AllowanceCharge>VALID_CODE</cac:AllowanceCharge>
</Invoice>

Technical Reference

XPath//cac:AllowanceCharge[cbc:ChargeIndicator='true' and not(cbc:AllowanceChargeReason) and not(cbc:AllowanceChargeReasonCode)]/cbc:AllowanceChargeReasonCode
SpecEN 16931
Operationset_default
StrategyAdd default charge reason code AAA when both reason text and code are missing

Common Causes

  • ·Document charge has no reason text or code
  • ·AllowanceCharge (charge) missing both reason fields
  • ·Surcharge added without explanation
  • ·Template missing charge reason fields
  • ·Generic charge applied without categorization

Seeing this in production? The API handles BR-CO-22 automatically. See the fix response →

Frequently Asked Questions

BR-CO-22 occurs when a document level charge (surcharge) exists but has no reason code (BT-105) or reason text (BT-104) explaining what the charge is for.

Add either AllowanceChargeReasonCode with a valid UNTDID 7161 code (e.g., AAA for Service charge, FC for Freight) or AllowanceChargeReason with descriptive text.

Yes, BR-CO-22 is a business rule violation that will cause invoice rejection. Buyers need to understand what charges they are being billed for.

Yes! Invoice Navigator automatically adds the default reason code AAA (Service charge) when no reason is provided. This is a standard charge code from UNTDID 7161.

Related Errors

Related Content

Last updated: 27 February 2026

Share this guide:

Validate your invoice

Drop your XML here to check for BR-CO-22

Auto-fix BR-CO-22 in seconds

Upload your invoice and we fix this error automatically. Financial fields are never touched.