errorbusinessEN 16931

BR-63:Buyer electronic address is missing its scheme identifier

Fix: This requires user input to resolve. Provide the correct value for `cbc:ElectronicMail` (BT-49). Provide the required value in the free validator.

Your invoice includes a buyer electronic address (EndpointID), but it does not specify what type of identifier it is. The scheme identifier tells the receiving system whether the address is a GLN number, a VAT number, a chamber of commerce number, or another type. Without it, the Peppol network cannot route the invoice to the correct recipient.

Severity
Fatal
Rule set
EN 16931
Country
All EU
Fix type
INPUT REQUIRED
Confidence
95%
Category
identifier

Engine Classification

Business data required · Explicit input workflow · No assumptions made

Required input: Buyer Electronic Address (EndpointID), Scheme ID

What is BR-63?

BR-63 is a fatal validation rule defined in the EN 16931 specification. It validates the @schemeID element under Party > EndpointID in the UBL invoice XML.

When this rule fires, the invoice is rejected by Peppol access points and never reaches the buyer.

Target path: cac:AccountingCustomerParty/cac:Party/cbc:EndpointID/@schemeID

Why This Error Matters

Invoice rejected. The scheme is required for electronic delivery routing.

BR-63 is a hard failure — the invoice must be corrected and re-sent before it can reach the recipient.

Without a scheme identifier on the buyer's electronic address, the Peppol Access Point cannot determine what type of identifier you are using. The invoice will be rejected because the network cannot verify and route it to the correct recipient. This blocks delivery and delays payment.

Validator Behavior

  • ·Causes invoice rejection
  • ·Error returned: BR-63
  • ·Specification: EN 16931

How to Fix It

1.

Identify the address type

Look at the buyer's electronic address value. Is it a VAT number (starts with country code like DE, NL), a GLN (13 digits), a chamber of commerce number (8 digits in NL), or something else?

2.

Find the correct scheme code

Common scheme codes: 0088 (GLN), 0106 (Dutch KvK), 9930 (German VAT), 9944 (Dutch VAT/BTW), 0007 (Swedish org number), 0009 (French SIRET). The full list is the CEF EAS code list.

3.

Add the schemeID attribute

Add schemeID="XXXX" to the EndpointID element in the buyer section of your invoice. For example: <cbc:EndpointID schemeID="9930">DE123456789</cbc:EndpointID>

Before / After

Failing XML
<cac:Contact>
  <!-- cbc:ElectronicMail is missing -->
</cac:Contact>
Corrected XML
<cac:Contact>
  <cbc:ElectronicMail>valid-value</cbc:ElectronicMail>
</cac:Contact>

Technical Reference

XPathcac:AccountingCustomerParty/cac:Party/cbc:EndpointID/@schemeID
SpecEN 16931
Operationderive
StrategyDerives the correct EAS scheme code from the buyer endpoint value pattern and buyer country code using inferSchemeFromEndpoint()

Common Causes

  • ·Invoicing software does not add schemeID when exporting the buyer EndpointID
  • ·EndpointID was manually entered without the scheme attribute
  • ·Template or mapping in ERP does not include the @schemeID attribute
  • ·Buyer address was copied from a different system that does not use scheme identifiers

Seeing this in production? The API handles BR-63 automatically. See the fix response →

Commonly Seen In

All invoicing software sending e-invoices via Peppol or using EN16931 format

Frequently Asked Questions

Your invoice includes a buyer electronic address (EndpointID), but it does not specify what type of identifier it is. The scheme identifier tells the receiving system whether the address is a GLN number, a VAT number, a chamber of commerce number, or another type. Without it, the Peppol network cannot route the invoice to the correct recipient.

This requires user input to resolve. Provide the correct value for `cbc:ElectronicMail` (BT-49). You can also use Invoice Navigator's compliance engine to correct this automatically in your pipeline.

Yes, BR-63 is a critical error that will cause invoice rejection. It must be fixed before submission.

Many instances of BR-63 can be automatically corrected using Invoice Navigator's compliance engine. The fix is applied in your pipeline with full audit evidence.

BR-63 is commonly seen in exports from All invoicing software sending e-invoices via Peppol or using EN16931 format. These packages sometimes generate invoices that need adjustment.

Related Errors

Related Content

Last updated: 22 April 2026

Share this guide:

Validate your invoice

Drop your XML here to check for BR-63

Fix BR-63 with guided input

Upload your invoice and we'll ask for the missing data, then apply a safe, auditable fix.